From: | Robert Stevens <robert.stevens@ucl.ac.uk> |
To: | Hector MacQueen <hector.macqueen@ed.ac.uk> |
CC: | James Lee <j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk> |
obligations@uwo.ca | |
Date: | 01/03/2010 19:31:37 UTC |
Subject: | Re: Pleural Plaques |
You only get the £5k if you started proceedings before Johnston/Rothwell
was decided. If you develop plaques now you have had it, unless you
actually fall ill.
R
> Perhaps worth noting, however, that pleural plaque victims in England
> & Wales are to receive ex gratia payments of £5,000 each from
> government, as sums representing the amount of damages they would have
> got had the Johnston/Rothwell cases been decided otherwise by the
> House of Lords.
>
> Jack Straw's full statement has the following passage:
>
> "On the basis of medical evidence received during the course of this
> review, including authoritative reports from the Chief Medical Officer
> and the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council, we are unable to
> conclude that the Law Lords’ decision should be overturned at this
> time or that an open-ended no-fault compensation scheme should be set
> up. While the current medical evidence is clear that pleural plaques
> are a marker of exposure to asbestos, and that exposure to asbestos
> significantly increases the risk of asbestos-related disease, any
> increased risk of a person with pleural plaques developing an
> asbestos-related disease arises because of that person’s exposure to
> asbestos rather than because of the plaques themselves."
>
> This may have interesting repercussions in the context of the judicial
> review of the Scottish legislation on this subject currently on-going
> in the Court of Session (first instance decision upholding the Act as
> within the legislative powers of the Scottish Parliament available
> here - http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2010CSOH02.html). I
> understand that the appeal in this case will be heard in July and has
> been put down for eight days in court.
>
> Hector
>
> --
> Hector L MacQueen
> Professor of Private Law
> Edinburgh Law School
> University of Edinburgh
> Edinburgh EH8 9YL
> UK
> Tel: (0)131-650-2060; Fax: (0)131-662-6317
>
>
> Quoting James Lee <j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk>:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> With thanks to Jonathan Morgan for drawing my attention to it,
>> colleagues may be interested to see that the Ministry of Justice
>> here in England has finally released its conclusion on the
>> consultation (which closed in late 2008) into whether to intervene
>> to reverse the 2007 decision of the House of Lords ([2007] UKHL 39)
>> that pleural plaques should not be actionable -
>> http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/announcement250210a.htm:
>>
>> "On the basis of medical evidence received during the course of this
>> review, including authoritative reports from the Chief Medical
>> Officer and the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council, we are unable
>> to conclude that the Law Lords' decision should be overturned at
>> this time or that an open-ended no-fault compensation scheme should
>> be set up. While the current medical evidence is clear that pleural
>> plaques are a marker of exposure to asbestos, and that exposure to
>> asbestos significantly increases the risk of asbestos-related
>> disease, any increased risk of a person with pleural plaques
>> developing an asbestos-related disease arises because of that
>> person's exposure to asbestos rather than because of the plaques
>> themselves. However, if new medical or other significant evidence
>> were to emerge, the government would obviously reassess the
>> situation."
>>
>> The Government has therefore decided against legislation, which
>> would have aligned English law with the response to the decision in
>> Scotland (subject to a Private Member's Bill which is unlikely to
>> pass without Government support before the election). Although one
>> must of course sympathise with the tragic predicament of claimants,
>> it would have been difficult to introduce such reforms in a manner
>> coherent with the rest of the law on damage in tort.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> James
>>
>> --
>> James Lee
>> Lecturer
>> Director of the LLB Programme
>> Birmingham Law School
>> University of Birmingham
>> Edgbaston
>> Birmingham
>> B15 2TT, United Kingdom
>>
>> Tel: +44 (0)121 414 3629
>> E-mail: j.s.f.lee@bham.ac.uk
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
>
>
--
Robert Stevens
Professor of Commercial Law
University College London